Synthetic intelligence has been touted for its capability to automate routine, high-volume duties at report velocity. However a brand new report finds the expertise can also be creating rigidity between employers and workers over its deployment.

Whereas 80% of human sources decision-makers polled by MetLife stated AI instruments are a part of on a regular basis duties, and 83% stated AI helps workers work sooner, 67% stated AI is “creating new factors of friction and distrust,” based on a brand new report from the monetary companies agency.

“We heard concern about job dislocation,” stated Todd Katz, head of U.S. group advantages at MetLife. “We heard concern about the necessity to adapt, and in order that’s creating friction — friction between the employer and the worker.”

Greater than half of workers surveyed, 61%, stated they’re apprehensive in regards to the moral and security dangers of AI use, together with bias, misinformation and a scarcity of accountability. Almost as many, 59%, are involved that it’ll make their jobs out of date and 24% really feel that they should compete with AI at work, MetLife discovered.

The MetLife examine compiled information from three surveys: two with about 2,500 workers every, carried out in October 2025 and January 2026, and one other in October 2025 with about 2,500 advantages decision-makers from giant, medium and small corporations. 

As AI reshapes careers by automating routine duties, consultants say it’s extra vital for employees to develop “human” abilities like strategic considering.

Assuaging employees’ issues has an important deal to don’t solely with expertise itself, but in addition how corporations introduce it and put together their workforce for it, stated Nela Richardson, chief economist for HR and payroll companies firm ADP.

“It takes enterprise processes. It takes change administration. It takes leveling up your workforce, upskilling your expertise, in order that they’re prepared for these instruments as effectively,” she stated.

Some workers is probably not up for the duty but. One other current survey, from BetterUp Labs and Stanford Social Media Lab, discovered that 53% of U.S. employees stated they’d turned in “workslop” — which the analysis defines as “AI-generated content material that appears good, however lacks substance.”

“It is low effort, low high quality on the a part of the one who is creating the AI-generated work, and it shifts the burden from the sender to the receiver,” stated Kate Niederhoffer, a social psychologist and chief scientist at BetterUp Labs, a analysis arm of the digital teaching platform. 

About 40% of employees stated they’d acquired “workslop” within the final month, based on the survey, which was carried out in September. 

“It is including further burden, further time, further toll, further judgment and a decrease chance of working with the people who find themselves creating it. That is actually the issue right here,” Niederhoffer stated. It makes it more durable for colleagues to collaborate, she stated, and can even contribute to distrust. 

SIGN UP: Cash 101 is an 8-week studying course on monetary freedom, delivered weekly to your inbox. Enroll right here. Additionally it is accessible in Spanish.